Washington and Lee law professor and director of the Tax Clinic was recently interviewed by John S. Keirnan of WalletHub.com. Professor Drumbl provides expert advise to accompany an article titled “What to Do if You Can’t Pay Your Taxes.” In the interview she discusses avoiding penalties for failing to file returns and the advantages of an installment plan over tapping other sources of funds to pay a tax liability.
Washington and Lee law professor Michelle Drumbl presented last week at the ABA Tax Midyear Meeting in Houston. The panel was titled “Fraud in the Return Preparation Industry” and addressed topics including the return preparation industry, how to report fraudulent return issues, how to resolve fraud and identification theft issues, and other related topics. Participants included Professor Scott A. Schumacher, University of Washington School of Law; Christopher J. Lee, Senior Attorney, Taxpayer Advocate Service, IRS; and Vijay Raghavan, Assistant Attorney General, Consumer Fraud Bureau, Illinois Attorney General’s Office.
Professor Drumbl’s presentation built upon her recent publication in Tax Notes, titled “When Helpers Hurt: Protecting Taxpayers from Preparers.” The paper, which has generated significant attention, is available on SSRN at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2545894.
Washington and Lee law professor Michelle Drumbl spoke at the 2014 Tax Law Symposium on October 3, 2014. The symposium was held at the University of Washington in Seattle.
Professor Drumbl spoke as part of a panel discussing EITC compliance.
The full program is available here.
On July 22-23, Washington and Lee School of Law hosted a round table discussion of tax professors from the mid-Atlantic region. Professors from area law schools presented works-in-progress for comment and critique.
Participants included, Eric Chason (William and Mary), Michael Doran (University of Virginia), Michelle Drumbl (W&L), Brant Hellwig (W&L), Ruth Mason (University of Virginia), Gregg Polsky (University of North Carolina), and Ethan Yale (University of Virginia).
The event was sponsored by the Frances Lewis Law Center at W&L.
At the recent ABA Tax Section Mid-Year Meeting Washington & Lee Law Professor Michelle Drumbl participated in two distinguished panels.
The first panel, hosted by the Tax Policy & Simplification Committee on Friday January 24th, was entitled “The Role of the IRS in the Administration of Social Welfare Policy”. Professor Drumbl’s remarks focused on the administration of refundable credits and their unduly punitive impact on those taxpayers who make inadvertent errors when claiming these social benefits on their tax return.
The second panel was hosted by the Pro Bono & Tax Clinics Committee on Saturday January 25th. The panel was entitled “Eliminating Errors and Penalties in Tax Return Preparation” and Professor Drumbl addressed the erroneous refund penalty as well as the potential impact of the recently decided Rand v. Commissioner case on low-income taxpayers.
Learn more about Professor Drumbl’s scholarship here.
Prof. Michelle Drumbl of Washington & Lee has recently made available on SSRN her forthcoming article Those Who Know, Those Who Don’t, and Those Who Know Better: Balancing Complexity, Sophistication, and Accuracy on Tax Returns, 11 Pitt. Tax Rev. ___ (2014). Here is the abstract:
Refundable credits, particularly the earned income tax credit (EITC) and the child tax credit, serve an important anti-poverty measure for low-income taxpayers. Annually, millions of taxpayers who do not owe any federal income tax must file a tax return in order to claim these credits that are in the nature of social benefits. The eligibility requirements for refundable credits are complex, and these returns are particularly prone to audit: EITC audits comprise one-third of all individual income tax audits. Because of the large dollar amounts at stake, a taxpayer’s mistaken understanding of the eligibility requirements for these refundable credits can often result in a deficiency of several thousand dollars. Though studies indicate that taxpayer error is more commonly inadvertent than intentional, the section 6662 20% accuracy-related penalty applies once the deficiency reaches a statutory “understatement” threshold; it is imposed computationally and without regard to the taxpayer’s intent.
By statute, taxpayers have the right to contest the accuracy-related penalty by demonstrating that there was reasonable cause for the underlying error and the taxpayer acted in good faith. Treasury regulations provide that such a circumstance might include “an honest misunderstanding of fact or law that is reasonable in light of all the facts and circumstances, including the experience, knowledge, and education of the taxpayer”. Yet for all of these reasons – lack of experience, lack of knowledge, and relative lack of education – the taxpayer is unlikely to have the knowledge or resources to raise the very defense that is meant to protect an unsophisticated taxpayer.
Drawing comparisons between refundable tax credits and social programs administered by other agencies, this article calls upon the IRS to better differentiate between inadvertent error (“those who don’t know”) and intentional or fraudulent error (“those who know better”). The article argues that the current accuracy-related penalty approach is unduly punitive. It concludes by proposing solutions that the IRS might consider in light of Congress’s desire for the Service to administer these social benefits through the Internal Revenue Code.
On Oct. 4, Washington and Lee law professor and Tax Clinic director Michelle Drumbl presented her research into low-income/unsophisticated taxpayers and the return preparer industry at a symposium at the University of Washington. The title of her presentation was “When Helpers Hurt: Protecting Taxpayers from their Return Preparers.”
She addressed a similar topic in an article that is forthcoming in a symposium volume of the Pittsburgh Tax Review. The article is titled “Those Who Know, Those Who Don’t, and Those Who Won’t: Balancing Complexity, Sophistication, and Accuracy on Tax Returns” and focuses on unsophisticated taxpayers and refundable tax credits.
In addition, Prof. Drumbl participated in the Villanova Law Review symposium on Sept. 27. Her panel discussed concerns with the return preparer industry, the IRS’s efforts to regulate tax return preparers, and the legal challenge brought in the Loving v. Commissioner case, now on appeal in the DC circuit.